How should I brief several Krea product-image edits without mixing region references or missing the moved object’s old position?

Assign one editing responsibility to each region

A merchant may need to replace a background tray and change a model's jacket in the same product advertisement. These are separate visual requests, even though they belong to one image.

Krea Annotations supports multiple colored, numbered rectangular regions. Each annotation card contains an independent prompt and can include a reference image associated with that region.

The merchant should specify which object each region concerns, what should change, and which reference belongs to it.

For example, a wooden tray reference should guide the tray region, while an approved jacket photograph should guide the clothing region. Do not assume either reference automatically governs the entire image.

Independent regional instructions help organize the brief, but they do not guarantee that every pixel outside those regions remains unchanged.

Decide whether simultaneous edits are appropriate

Multiple annotated regions can be submitted together. This can suit a campaign where the tray and jacket changes are already independently defined.

However, simultaneous editing is not mandatory. If the second decision depends on the first result, sequential editing may be easier to review.

Choose the order according to the merchant's decision dependencies rather than assuming one approach is always faster or more accurate.

Keep product identity requirements separate from decorative changes. If the advertised item must remain the same, compare its visible characteristics against the approved product source after the combined edit.

Stop when an annotation reference is ambiguous about which region it should influence. Clarify the brief before generating another result.

Illustrative exercise: two regions and a moved vase

Illustrative exercise — fictional merchant scenarios, not executed Krea edits, generation requests, or image-quality tests.

Input A is a fashion advertisement requiring a wooden display tray and a different approved jacket. The merchant creates separate instructions for the tray and clothing regions, with each reference assigned to its corresponding annotation.

The review should check both requested changes and whether the advertised product remains recognizable.

Input B is a fragrance photograph containing a decorative vase beside the bottle. The merchant wants the vase moved away from the product, but the tabletop underneath contains a distinctive pattern.

Krea Edit's object movement includes inpainting the gap left at the original position. The merchant must therefore review both the vase's new placement and the reconstructed tabletop.

Generated filling should not be described as recovery of the actual previously hidden tabletop.

Review the complete edit footprint

Use a two-part review for regional changes: verify each annotation's intended result, then inspect the combined image for unintended interactions.

For moved objects, add a separate check for the old location. The new position may look appropriate while the filled background contains an invented or inconsistent pattern.

When the original background carries important visual information, preserve the approved source and compare the generated area carefully.

If the required hidden detail is not visible in any source, do not treat inpainting as factual reconstruction. Obtain suitable reference material or revise the composition.

The handoff is complete when each region's reference responsibility is clear and both the destination and former location of moved objects have been reviewed.

Illustrative exercise — Regional references and object-movement review

These are illustrative exercise rows. Save a copy and record your own observations; the example is not an executed acceptance test.

Download review worksheet (CSV)